[Beowulf] Q: IB message rate & large core counts (per node)?
Shainer at mellanox.com
Tue Feb 23 18:08:48 EST 2010
> The benchmark that we created is not a coalescing benchmark.
> Coalescing produces a meaningless answer from the message rate
> benchmark. Real apps don't get much of a benefit from message
> coalescing, but (if they send smallish messages) they get a big
> benefit from a good non-coalesced message rate.
Agree, most benefit will come from non-coalesced message rate - and for
the broader audience - from the ability to send one MPI message within a
single network packet. Message coalescing is when you incorporate
multiple MPI messages in a single network packet.
> If you look back in the archives of this list, you can find me saying
> that. And some other people were involved in the discussion, too.
> Or, we can take your word for what happened, instead of looking at
> history. I know which method you prefer.
You can look at history or not, your decision. My claim (and more
important for the present) is that the so called "non-coalescing"
results published on latest InfiniPath based products are actually with
coalescing. The other universe you called it?
Beowulf mailing list, Beowulf at beowulf.org sponsored by Penguin Computing
To change your subscription (digest mode or unsubscribe) visit http://www.beowulf.org/mailman/listinfo/beowulf
More information about the Beowulf