[Beowulf] recommendation on crash cart for a cluster room: full cluster KVM is not an option I suppose?

Rahul Nabar rpnabar at gmail.com
Wed Sep 30 09:13:52 EDT 2009

On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 1:26 AM, Mark Hahn <hahn at mcmaster.ca> wrote:

>> Note that for my head nodes etc. I do plan on having a small (4 port)
>> KVM in the main rack with its console and rackmount keyboard. I guess
> not worth it imo - I'd use the crash cart, since the need is so rare.

Good point! If "IPMI over LAN" works so well I might as well get rid
of this mini KVM.

> ipmi ipmi ipmi.  try to avoid the obnoxious nonstandard proprietary POS's
> that vendors push.

Thanks for the comments Mark.  I'll try and not offend any vendors
this time around! :) I had stayed away from "remote manage" precisely
because most of what I had heard seemed vendor specific, proprietary
systems. I wasn't aware of this public implementation of remote

>you want remote power on/off/reset, then serial
> redirect and hopefully bios redirect too.  then temperature monitoring,
> and SEL access.  this should be in every entry-level server IMO.
> you know the vendor has jumped the shark if/when they provide xml-based
> scripting and offer licensed extended features rather than standard ipmi
> support...

There are indeed a large number of vendor specific GUI solutions out
there. I had played with one of those and it sort of put me off
"remote manage" [Again, no offense vendors.] But I'll definitely toy
with getting "IPMI over LAN" especially since all of you are so
unanimously happy about it!!


Beowulf mailing list, Beowulf at beowulf.org sponsored by Penguin Computing
To change your subscription (digest mode or unsubscribe) visit http://www.beowulf.org/mailman/listinfo/beowulf

More information about the Beowulf mailing list