[Beowulf] distributed file storage solution?

Craig Tierney ctierney at hypermall.net
Mon Dec 11 23:20:27 EST 2006

Brian D. Ropers-Huilman wrote:
> On 12/11/06, Craig Tierney <ctierney at hypermall.net> wrote:
>> Lustre supports redundant meta-data servers (MDS) and failover for the
>> object-storage servers (OSS).  However, "high-performing" is relative.
>> Great at streaming data, not at meta-data.
> Which is really the bane of all cluster file systems, isn't it? Meta
> data accesses kill performance.

Some are better than others.  Lustre could have been designed from day
one so that every OSS was also a metadata server (MDS), but they didn't. 
  It is on their roadmap to distribute meta-data, but it doesn't look like
there will be a 1 to 1 relationship between MDS and OSS.

If I wanted a more general purpose distributed filesystem, those with 
distributed meta-data can provide better performance.  If I wanted to 
provide a filesystem to my users where compiles wouldn't be horribly 
painful, tests with Ibrix showed it was adequate.  I would be interested 
in testing some of the others (Panasas, Isilon) to see how they compare.

Beowulf mailing list, Beowulf at beowulf.org
To change your subscription (digest mode or unsubscribe) visit http://www.beowulf.org/mailman/listinfo/beowulf


More information about the Beowulf mailing list