[Beowulf] The Case for an MPI ABI

Rusty Lusk lusk at mcs.anl.gov
Tue Feb 22 12:06:05 EST 2005

From: Greg Lindahl <lindahl at pathscale.com>
Subject: [Beowulf] The Case for an MPI ABI
Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 21:08:24 -0800
> This talk:
> http://www.openib.org/docs/oib_wkshp_022005/mpi-abi-pathscale-lindahl.pdf
> mostly talks about why we need an ABI, who wins and loses as a result
> of having one, and the pieces that could be in it. Please give it a
> look.

One piece you include is the replacement of the non-portable mpirun with
an mpistart with standard arguments.  You might note that the MPI-2
forum addressed this issue with the specification of an mpiexec with
standard arguments.  MPICH2 implements it.


Beowulf mailing list, Beowulf at beowulf.org
To change your subscription (digest mode or unsubscribe) visit http://www.beowulf.org/mailman/listinfo/beowulf

More information about the Beowulf mailing list