[Beowulf] Re: Re: Home beowulf - NIC latencies

Patrick Geoffray patrick at myri.com
Wed Feb 16 07:04:31 EST 2005

Ashley Pittman wrote:

> Interesting enough the STEN is a very good example of what is being
> discussed here, doing a remote write (Or MPI send) using the STEN is
> lower latency than using a DMA but uses more CPU cycles (as the STEN
> needs the data to be "pushed" from the main CPU whereas a (R)DMA only
> needs the DMA descriptor to be "pushed" and the NIC then "pulls" the
> actual data).

It seems to be common practice to use PIO for small messages on the send 
side. MX/Myrinet does that too (whereas GM/Myrinet does not), SCI does 
it, Greg's IB on HT does it. I don't know who is not burning some cycles 
to get lower latency for small messages these days.


Patrick Geoffray
Myricom, Inc.
Beowulf mailing list, Beowulf at beowulf.org
To change your subscription (digest mode or unsubscribe) visit http://www.beowulf.org/mailman/listinfo/beowulf

More information about the Beowulf mailing list