large filesystem & fileserver architecture issues.
Gerry Creager N5JXS
gerry.creager at tamu.edu
Thu Aug 7 09:54:29 EDT 2003
Mark Hahn wrote:
>>SuperMicro X5DAE Motherboard
>>dual Xeon 2.8GHz processors
>>2 GB Kingston Registered ECC RAM
>>2 HighPoint RocketRAID 404 4-channel IDE RAID adapters
>>10 Maxtor 250 GB 7200 RPM disks
>>1 Maxtor 60 GB drive for system work
>>1 long multi-drop disk power cable...
>>SuperMicro case (nomenclature escapes me, however, it has 1 disk bays
>>and fits the X5DAE MoBo
>>Cheapest PCI video card I could find (no integrated video on MoBo)
>>Add-on Intel GBE SC fiber adapter
>>
>>Drawbacks:
>>1. I should have checked for integrated video for simplicity
>
>
> I did something similar a little while back: a tyan thunder e7500 board,
> just one Xeon, just 1G ram, integrated video/gigabit (copper), 3ware 8500-8
> in jbod mode, 8x200G WD JB disks and a ~500W PS.
>
> I don't see any reason for adding extra ram or putting in multiple,
> higher-powered CPUs for a fileserver.
This one will A) be on the Unidata weather distribution network for
general weather data AND the newer real-time radar feeds; B) be
extracting some of that data for graphics; C) be doing NNTP for Unidata
(one, exactly, newsgroup) for a research project; D) reside on the I2
Logistical Backbone... It's a busy box.
>>2. Current HighPoint drivers for RH9 are not RAID yet; use RH7.3 with
>>ALL the patches
>
> I'll be doing more boxes, probably with something like 8x250 SATA disks,
> with a pair of promise tx4 cards. open-source drivers for these cards
> recently became available, btw.
>
> there was a very interesting talk at OLS about doing raid intelligently
> over a network...
Check out loki.cs.utk.edu (I think: It's certainly a project called
'loki' and run by Micah Beck at utk.edu) about the logistical backbone.
I didn't go with Promise cards because of one of my grad students, who's
obviously better funded than me... He's looked at Promise, HighPoint and
at least one other card, and had comparisons, and strongly recommended
HighPoint as a Price/Performance leader. The HighPoints were less
expensive and currently boast the same performance as the tx4's.
Everyone's getting into the SATA game; I didn't go that way because I
wanted to get to the 2 TB point and couldn't reasonably do it today with
SATA; maybe later.
I didn't want to take the time to hack the drivers HighPoint had
available, since i'm overloaded these days.
--
Gerry Creager -- gerry.creager at tamu.edu
Network Engineering -- AATLT, Texas A&M University
Cell: 979.229.5301 Office: 979.458.4020 FAX: 979.847.8578
Page: 979.228.0173
Office: 903A Eller Bldg, TAMU, College Station, TX 77843
_______________________________________________
Beowulf mailing list, Beowulf at beowulf.org
To change your subscription (digest mode or unsubscribe) visit http://www.beowulf.org/mailman/listinfo/beowulf
More information about the Beowulf
mailing list