im guessing that it is yucky. it must be quite hard writing a program for multiple cores and processors<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Sat, Jun 28, 2008 at 9:59 PM, <<a href="mailto:Dan.Kidger@quadrics.com">Dan.Kidger@quadrics.com</a>> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"><div class="Ih2E3d">Greg wrote:<br>
<br>
> Many-core chips that look like a big x86 SMP don't look anything like<br>
> a GPU. With the addition of a few commuications primitives, MPI<br>
> will run even better on big x86 SMPs. All of the programming<br>
> approaches for GPUs and Clearspeed and historical array processors<br>
> are yucky compared to "high level language + MPI".<br>
<br>
</div>Are you daring to suggest say that using MPI is not yucky ?<br>
<br>
Daniel<br>
<div><div></div><div class="Wj3C7c"><br>
<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Beowulf mailing list, <a href="mailto:Beowulf@beowulf.org">Beowulf@beowulf.org</a><br>
To change your subscription (digest mode or unsubscribe) visit <a href="http://www.beowulf.org/mailman/listinfo/beowulf" target="_blank">http://www.beowulf.org/mailman/listinfo/beowulf</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br>Jonathan Aquilina
<br />--
<br />This message has been scanned for viruses and
<br />dangerous content by
<a href="http://www.mailscanner.info/"><b>MailScanner</b></a>, and is
<br />believed to be clean.