Geoff,<br>
Oops! I totally misunderstood it. So it's strictly shared-memory, and
requires something like MPI for crossing nodes. Gotcha. Big mistake,
thanks.<br>
Peter<br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">On 6/26/08, <b class="gmail_sendername">Geoff Jacobs</b> <<a href="mailto:gdjacobs@gmail.com">gdjacobs@gmail.com</a>> wrote:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
Peter St. John wrote:<br> > Well I was really thinking that OpenMP might be easiest, the fastest<br> > from setup to application running for someone new (which would include<br> > me, this is hypothetical for me, but I think for myself I'll use MPI not<br>
> OpenMP, because I want to micromanage the message passing) but I"m no<br> > expert by any any means.<br> ><br> > OpenMP is <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OpenMP">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OpenMP</a> (wiki)<br>
> Peter<br> <br><snip><br> <br> I was thinking the lack of ability to do things across nodes leaves<br> OpenMP in the lurch in this case.<br> <br> </blockquote></div><br>
<br />--
<br />This message has been scanned for viruses and
<br />dangerous content by
<a href="http://www.mailscanner.info/"><b>MailScanner</b></a>, and is
<br />believed to be clean.