<div>My apologies (not that I think the 3-processor thing is bad), but my mistake, AMD not Intel.</div>
<div>The item was from Slashdot's 9-19 "headlines",</div>
<div> </div>
<div>AMD Announces Triple-Core Phenom Processors<br> from the chips-that-don't-require-dipping dept.<br> posted by Zonk on Monday September 17, @23:26 (AMD)<br> <a onclick="return top.js.OpenExtLink(window,event,this)" href="http://hardware.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=07/09/18/0217223" target="_blank">
http://hardware.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=07/09/18/0217223</a><br> </div>
<div>Peter<br><br> </div>
<div><span class="gmail_quote">On 9/21/07, <b class="gmail_sendername">Lombard, David N</b> <<a href="mailto:dnlombar@ichips.intel.com">dnlombar@ichips.intel.com</a>> wrote:</span>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="PADDING-LEFT: 1ex; MARGIN: 0px 0px 0px 0.8ex; BORDER-LEFT: #ccc 1px solid">On Thu, Sep 20, 2007 at 11:32:26AM -0400, Peter St. John wrote:<br>><br>> P.S. also Intel (according to slashdot) intends to sell 3-core processors
<br>> (so they can sell quad cores that have a manufacturing defect; reminds me of<br>> the 487 "SX" math coprocessor, an i486 with a defect in the CPU component).<br>> Since that means more RAM on the motherboard per core, that might be very
<br>> economical for some types of applications.<br><br>Hmmm. Perhaps another reading will identify other than Intel...<br><br>--<br>David N. Lombard, Intel, Irvine, CA<br>I do not speak for Intel Corporation; all comments are strictly my own.
<br></blockquote></div><br>
!DSPAM:46f41238245588298414181!