<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="PADDING-LEFT: 1ex; MARGIN: 0px 0px 0px 0.8ex; BORDER-LEFT: #ccc 1px solid">
<div>In spite of it being in "unfit" individuals only,<br>if you lose those individuals you lose any possibility of ever getting<br>that gene right!</div></blockquote>
<div> </div>
<div>An artificial Founder's Effect.</div>
<div> </div>
<div> Vermont's sugar maple trees are migrating north towards Canada. In the new territory, the ideal genotype for the region's soil and weather factors may never evolve c/o natural selection, if during the transition phase those trees containing the ideal genes for Canadan soil were not yet generally dispersed over the entire matrix's meta population.
</div>
<div> </div>
<div>I have read that the discovery of more protein iterations than does exist genes may encourage humans to rethink the Central Dogma theory of one gene one protein. Advantageous phenotype behavior may not always result as a causual relationship with a genetic change as drastic as a new gene locus, if spliseosomes have epigenetically caused the beneficial behavior.
</div>
<div> </div>
<div>I guess the idea is that nature is sometimes recursive and that the island model can be used to help explain gene behavior? If someone where studying genes, I would think their model would be constrained to their specie of study, and the behavior between paramecium and trees probably would have radical chromosome differences.
</div>