question about Intel P4 versus Alpha's
kus at free.net
Mon Jul 23 12:44:16 EDT 2012
According to Dominic Wu
> Is HT anything more than a thinly-veiled attempt at luring more software
> developers to develop multi-threaded applications so as to help Intel sell
> more CPU in the future? (I.E. the new fangled software that is optimized
> for HT can really benefit from additional REAL processors instead of using
> just HT?)
No. It looks that the "reasons" were other. 1) It is known that
a lot of "execution resources" (in particular, execution units) of
superscalar microprocessors are not used (simultaneously) by
many applications - especially which don't give heavy load for
CPUs. 2) The possibility to organize multitherading execution
by modern superscalar chips "costs" (in the sense of additional
hardware ) very low, and was practically realized by Intel a lot of time ago.
But they opened this possibility for users only early.
3) One of the powerful "reasons" to propose HT was the war w/AMD;
HT is excellent marketing step.
BTW, IMHO, we must say "thanks" to Intel for introducing HT:
now paralelization will come to desktop computer, and the corresponding
parallelization technologies will be necessary for new areas of applications.
Zelinsky Institute of Organic Chemistry
Beowulf mailing list, Beowulf at beowulf.org
To change your subscription (digest mode or unsubscribe) visit http://www.beowulf.org/mailman/listinfo/beowulf
More information about the Beowulf