[Beowulf] Pricing and Trading Networks: Down is Up, Left is Right
Lux, Jim (337C)
james.p.lux at jpl.nasa.gov
Fri Feb 17 23:45:17 EST 2012
>>>> The biggest, baddest Virtex 7 (XC7V2000TL2FLG1925E) is a mere
>>>> $132k, qty 1
>>>> (drops to $127k in qty 1000)
>>>> (16 week lead time)
>>>> 2 million logic cells 70 Mb onchip block ram, 3600 dsp slices,
>>>> transceivers, etc.etc.etc.
>>> how high that would clock?
>> It's a bit tricky when talking clock rates in FPGAs.. Most designs are
>> only regionally synchronous, so you need to take into account
>> delays across the chip if you want max performance.
>> You feed a low speed clock (few hundred MHz) into the chip and it gets
>> multiplied up in onchip DPLLs/DCMs.
>> The MMCM takes 1066 Mhz max input.
>I'm guessing around a 2.5Ghz.
Maybe, maybe not. Most big FPGA designs I've seen aren't one big
synchronous blob in any case.
If you have a pipelined process spread across the chip, you might clock
individual chunks at X Mhz, but there's N cycles to get through the
pipeline. Kind of depends whether in to out latency is important or bits
per second throughput, I suppose.
The old stationwagon full of tapes vs hot stuff ASIC.
>On the FPGA card there's gonna be massive SRAM besides a solarflare NIC.
Maybe, maybe not. If you're shoving buffers around, parallelism might be
more important than raw memory access time.
>I would guess the chip can do the simple trading decisions in a
>pretty simple manner.
>This keeps the chipdesign relative simple and you can focus upon
>clocking it high.
When you're talking designs with 10s of millions of gates, you can do
pretty complex things.
>Also forget normal RAM. No nothing DDR3. Just SRAM and many dozens of
>gigabytes of it as we want to keep the entire day preferably in RAM
>and our analysis are nonstop hammering onto the SRAM so basically the
>bandwidth to the SRAM determines how fast our analysis will be.
I just cited the DDR3 as an example out of the datasheet. I'm sure that
if you're interested you'll go download the Virtex 7 data sheet and study
>As for the mainboards, to quote someone : "there are some very custom
>designs out there".
I doubt there is anything such as a "standard" board using a $100k FPGA.
I'd bet a fair number of cold frosty beverages that ALL boards using this
kind of thing fit the "custom" category.
>> I seriously doubt that even a huge customer is going to change
>> plans. They basically push the technology to what they can do
>> by manufacturability.
>> Then you have all the thermal issues to worry about. These big
>> parts can
>> dissipate more heat than you can get out through the package/pins,
>> or even
>> spread across the die.
>It has crossed my mind for just a second that if 1 government would
>put 1 team together and fund it,
>and have them produce a magnificent trading solution,
>which for example plugs in flawless into the IBM websphere,
>and have their own traders buy this, especially small ones with just
>ties to their own nation, that in theory things still are total legal.
There was a famous challenge about breaking DES, where it was done with
But why would a government fund such a thing (except perhaps as an
economic weapon.. Humorous thoughts of died in the wool Marxists cackling
at the thought of destroying the capitalists with their own trading tools,
developed by a centrally planned "trading machine establishment #3".
>How do you get the best software engineers then for your trading
By asking your other software developers? As we used to call it in the
entertainment industry "Neportunity".
>And what would that 'other channel' be then?
>Vaste majority simply isn't doing this.
Let's see.. Unemployment in the software industry is down around 3% these
days (viz 8-12% in general, and 20-25% in certain demographics and areas).
They're finding jobs somehow. 10:1 or 50:1 resume to open position isn't
uncommon. Somehow they find the 1 in 50, and a fair number of studies show
that it's not done by some HR person carefully reviewing the 50 resumes to
find the one shining diamond.
>No matter how genius you are, if all you do is write fortran, and
>didn't study finance,
>then you are not allowed to write a trading application, AS YOU WON'T
>GET HIRED :)
More an example that different industries hire for different skill sets
and backgrounds. You're right, I can't imagine FORTRAN being very useful
in trading. But hey, I don't write trading apps.. For all I know it's
mostly matrix math and FORTRAN is pretty good for that. Maybe they want
people who write FORTH or LISP or PROLOG.
The point is, it's a very niche market, looking for a very niche
programmer that is probably not remotely representative of software
developers at large.
>> I didn't get my job at JPL by submitting a resume, and I think
>When you got there, there was a circle at your resume around the word
Actually not.. I hadn't worked at JPL then. The circle was around
"microscan compressive receiver", purely by chance.
Beowulf mailing list, Beowulf at beowulf.org sponsored by Penguin Computing
To change your subscription (digest mode or unsubscribe) visit http://www.beowulf.org/mailman/listinfo/beowulf
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
More information about the Beowulf