[Beowulf] Re: rsbep issues

Thanassis Tsiodras ttsiodras at gmail.com
Fri Jun 11 13:16:22 EDT 2010


I don't know if adding the beowulf mailing list address to CC will
work - if it doesn't, please forward this response on my behalf.

Your question abou the output size:

Due to the mechanics of reed-solomon, if we want to be able to recover
from sector errors, our input split must be (a) split in large
sections and (b) interleaved. You can read the relevant theory from my
"Algorithm" section on my rsbep page
(http://users.softlab.ece.ntua.gr/~ttsiod/rsbep.html) where I explain
why we need to interleave the stream...

So, rsbep, on its own, creates outputs of multiples of 1040400.

This won't do, of course - we don't want to see garbage after our
"removal of shield" (piped to our gzip / bzip2 / lzma / whatever) ...

So what does my package do?
It installs two helper scripts (freeze.sh / melt.sh) which add a
simple header on the stream, BEFORE shielding it with Reed-Solomon, so
that the decoding side uses this size to "chop" off the extra cruft at
the end...

So if you use the tools as described in the packaged README, and as
described on the site (that is, via freeze.sh/melt.sh) then you won't
see the "garbage at the end" problem.

The other thing you report, about the "silent corruption", is serious.

If you check my configure.ac, you'll see that it checks for GCC version:

# Check for bad GCC version (4.4.x create bad code for rs32.c)
AX_GCC_VERSION
if test `expr substr $GCC_VERSION 1 3` == "4.4" ; then
        AC_MSG_ERROR([GCC Series 4.4.x generate bad code... Please use
4.3.x instead])
fi

Unfortunately, it's not just 4.4 - something has changed after GCC 4.3
that breaks the rsbep code... You can either use the 4.3.x series, or
compile in plain-C mode (hardcode X86ASM to "no"). I use Debian, where
the stable GCC version is 4.3.4, and therefore I don't see this bug...

I updated autoconf check to stop the build if it detects GCC >= 4.4.

That's all I can do for now... if you have the time/resources to
figure out why the code broke after this GCC version, I'd happily
publish your patches... (I use Debian, where the stable GCC is 4.3.4,
and this problem doesn't manifest):

bash$ dd if=/dev/urandom of=data bs=1M count=100
100+0 records in
100+0 records out
104857600 bytes (105 MB) copied, 20.0936 s, 5.2 MB/s
bash$ freeze.sh data > data.shielded
bash$ dd if=/dev/zero of=data.shielded conv=notrunc bs=512 count=127
bash$ melt.sh data.shielded | md5sum
rsbep: number of corrected failures   : 64784
rsbep: number of uncorrectable blocks : 0
b55c7886465da082c4949698858d342c  -
bash$ cat data | md5sum
b55c7886465da082c4949698858d342c  -

So the data were recovered fine, even after a loss of 127 consecutive sectors.

I hope this helps...

Kind regards,
Thanassis Tsiodras, Dr.-Ing.

On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 10:29 PM, David Mathog <mathog at caltech.edu> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I posted in the beowulf mailing list (beowulf at beowulf.org) asking for
> suggestions for a program that would  allow recovery from corrupted
> media, and your rsbep variant was suggested.  So I gave it a try, and it
> had some issues with the test data I ran.  Possibly because the files
> were so large?
>
> It was built on a Mandriva 2008.1 system with:
>
> ./configure --prefix=/usr/common
> make
> make install
>
> I posted my observations to the beowulf mailing list, but am including a
> copy of them below my signature.  Perhaps you might want to respond to
> that list with corrections to whatever I did wrong, or a notice of a
> patched version of the program, if these really are bugs.
>
> I will send you a copy of the pockmark program in a separate email.
>
> Thanks,
>
> David Mathog
> mathog at caltech.edu
> Manager, Sequence Analysis Facility, Biology Division, Caltech
>
> ------------- Forwarded message follows -------------
>
> Jesse Becker and others suggested:
>
>>     http://users.softlab.ntua.gr/~ttsiod/rsbep.html
>
> I tried it and it works, mostly, but definitely has some warts.
>
> To start with I gave it a negative control - a file so badly corrupted
> it should NOT have been able to recover it.
>
> % ssh remotePC 'dd if=/dev/sda1 bs=8192' >img.orig
> % cat img.orig      | bzip2 >img.bz2.orig
> % cat img.bz2.orig  | rsbep > img.bz2.rsbep
> % cat img.bz2.rsbep | pockmark -maxgap 100000 -maxrun 10000
>>img.bz2.rsbep.pox
> % cat img.bz2.rsbep.pox | rsbep -d -v >img.bz2.restored
> rsbep: number of corrected failures   : 9725096
> rsbep: number of uncorrectable blocks : 0
>
> img.orig is a Windows XP partition with all empty space filled with
> 0x0 bytes.  That is then compressed with bzip2, then run
> through rsbep (the one from the link above), then corrupted
> with pockmark.  Pockmark is my own little concoction, when used as
> shown  it stamps 0x0 bytes starting randomly every (1-MAXGAP) bytes, for
> a run of (1-MAXRUN).  In both cases the gap and run length are chosen at
> random from those ranges for each new gap/run.
> This should corrupt around 10% of the file, which I assumed would render
> it unrecoverable.  Notice in the file sizes below that the overall size
> did not change when the file was run through pockmark.  rsbep did not
> note any errors it couldn't correct. However, the
> size of the restored file is not the same as the orig.
>
>  4056976560 2010-06-08 17:51 img.bz2.restored
>  4639143600 2010-06-08 16:19 img.bz2.rsbep.pox
>  4639143600 2010-06-08 16:13 img.bz2.rsbep
>  4056879025 2010-06-08 14:40 img.bz2.orig
> 20974431744 2010-06-07 15:23 img.orig
>
> % bunzip2 -tvv img.bz2.restored
>  img.bz2.restored:
>    [1: huff+mtf data integrity (CRC) error in data
>
> So at the very least rsbep sometimes says it has recovered a file when
> it has not.  I didn't really expect it to rescue this particular input,
> but it really should have handled it better.   I reran it with a less
> damaged file like this:
>
>
> % cat img.bz2.rsbep | pockmark -maxgap 1000000 -maxrun 10000
>>img.bz2.rsbep.pox2
> % cat img.bz2.rsbep.pox2 | rsbep -d -v >img.bz2.restored2
> rsbep: number of corrected failures   : 46025036
> rsbep: number of uncorrectable blocks : 0
> % bunzip2 img.bz2.restored2
> bunzip2: Can't guess original name for img.bz2.restored2 -- using
> img.bz2.restored2.out
> bunzip2: img.bz2.restored2: trailing garbage after EOF ignored
> % md5sum img.bz2.restored2.out img.orig
> 7fbaec7143c3a17a31295a803641aa3c  img.bz2.restored2.out
> 7fbaec7143c3a17a31295a803641aa3c  img.orig
>
> This time it was able to recover the corrupted file, but again, it
> created an output file which was a different size.  Is this always the
> case?   Seems to be at least for the size file used here:
>
> % cat img.bz2.orig | rsbep | rsbep -d > nopox.bz2
>
> nopox.bz2 is also 4056976560.   The decoded output is always 97535 bytes
> larger than the original, which may bear some relation to the
> z=ERR_BURST_LEN parameter as:
>
>  97535 /765 = 127.496732
>
> which is suspiciously close to 255/2.  Or that could just be a coincidence.
>
> In any case, bunzip2 was able to handle the crud on the end, but this
> would have been a problem for other binary files.
>
> Tbe other thing that is frankly bizarre is the number of "corrected"
> failures for the 2nd case vs. the first.    The 2nd should have 10X
> fewer bad bytes than the first, but the rsbep status messages
> indicate 4.73X MORE.  However, the number of bad bytes in the 2nd is
> almost exactly 1%, as it should be.  All of this suggests that rsbep
> does not handle correctly files which are "too" corrupted.  It gives the
> wrong number of corrected blocks and thinks that it has corrected
> everything when it has not done so.  Worse, even when it does work the
> output file was never (in any of the test cases) the same size as the
> input file.
>
> I think this program has potential but it needs a bit of work to sand
> the rough edges off.  I will have a look at it, but won't have a chance
> to do so for a couple of weeks.
>
> Regards,
>
> David Mathog
> mathog at caltech.edu
> Manager, Sequence Analysis Facility, Biology Division, Caltech
>
>
>
>
>



-- 
What I gave, I have; what I spent, I had; what I kept, I lost. -Old Epitaph

_______________________________________________
Beowulf mailing list, Beowulf at beowulf.org sponsored by Penguin Computing
To change your subscription (digest mode or unsubscribe) visit http://www.beowulf.org/mailman/listinfo/beowulf

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.



More information about the Beowulf mailing list