[Beowulf] first cluster
rpnabar at gmail.com
Tue Jul 13 00:29:13 EDT 2010
On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 2:02 PM, Gus Correa <gus at ldeo.columbia.edu> wrote:
> Consider disk for:
> A) swap space (say, if the user programs are large,
> or you can't buy a lot of RAM, etc);
Out of curiosity, is there the possibility of running a "swapless"
compute-node? I mean most HPC nodes already have fairly generous RAM
and once swapping to disk starts performance is degraded (severely?).
Are there non-problem scenarios where one does desire swapping to
> D) Most current node chassis have hot-swappable disks, not hard to replace,
> in case of failure.
Hot-swappable disks are great on head nodes but on compute-nodes
whenever I hear "redundant" or "hot swappable", I see it as an
inefficiency. Or a excessive feature that could be traded off for a
cost saving. (of course, sometimes hands are tied if the server comes
with that feature "standard") What do others think?
Beowulf mailing list, Beowulf at beowulf.org sponsored by Penguin Computing
To change your subscription (digest mode or unsubscribe) visit http://www.beowulf.org/mailman/listinfo/beowulf
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
More information about the Beowulf