[Beowulf] recommendation on crash cart for a cluster room: full cluster KVM is not an option I suppose?
rpnabar at gmail.com
Wed Sep 30 09:23:52 EDT 2009
On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 8:19 AM, Hearns, John <john.hearns at mclaren.com> wrote:
> It depends. Supermicro use the shared-socket approach (actually it is a bridge
> somewhere on the motherboard), or with Supermicro you can have a separate
> socket using a little cable with a minu-USB connector onto the IPMI card.
> Other manufacturers use (a) or (b).
> On a blade setup the IPMI is carried over the backplane Ethernet links.
> If you have a separate IPMI network (ILOM, DRAC, whatever they call it) you
> do not need the same type of switches. What you need is some cheap 10/100 switches,
> one in each rack. Say Netgear or D-Link. Not a central switch with a huge backbone capacity.
> Then you just connect the switches together in a loop.
I like the shared socket approach. Building a separate IPMI network
seems a lot of extra wiring to me. Admittedly the IPMI switches can be
configured to be dirt cheap but it still feels like building a extra
tiny road for one car a day when a huge highway with spare capacity
exists right next door carrying thousands of cars. (Ok, cheesy
Beowulf mailing list, Beowulf at beowulf.org sponsored by Penguin Computing
To change your subscription (digest mode or unsubscribe) visit http://www.beowulf.org/mailman/listinfo/beowulf
More information about the Beowulf