[Beowulf] Disappointing floating point performance for X5560 versus SPECmarks?
landman at scalableinformatics.com
Mon Oct 12 17:26:08 EDT 2009
Gerasimatos, Dimitrios V (343K) wrote:
> According to SPECfp2006, the X5560 should blow the doors off of the E5430.
> The X5560 scores 36 while the E5430 scores about 18.
> However, our own benchmarking using nbench, unixbench, and a home-grown
> utility (twobod) all show that any differences are attributed to clock speed.
I wouldn't use specfp**** ratios as a realistic guide for performance
comparison. As always, use your own code. If your code shows 2x,
great. If not, then attribute the specfp**** to what they are
(marketing numbers, with some grounding in reality, but not a firm
comparison metric for dissimilar apps).
Joseph Landman, Ph.D
Founder and CEO
Scalable Informatics Inc.
email: landman at scalableinformatics.com
web : http://scalableinformatics.com
phone: +1 734 786 8423 x121
fax : +1 866 888 3112
cell : +1 734 612 4615
Beowulf mailing list, Beowulf at beowulf.org sponsored by Penguin Computing
To change your subscription (digest mode or unsubscribe) visit http://www.beowulf.org/mailman/listinfo/beowulf
More information about the Beowulf