[Beowulf] scheduler recommendations for a HPC cluster
beckerjes at mail.nih.gov
Wed Oct 7 22:24:48 EDT 2009
On Tue, Oct 06, 2009 at 03:22:14PM -0400, Rahul Nabar wrote:
>Any strong / weak recommendations for / against schedulers? For a long
I'm a happy SGE user, and have been for 7+ years.
A basic install does simple FIFO queuing (just like Torque, from what
I've heard). It is fairly easy to add various "fairness" mechanisms to
make sure that a single user doesn't take over the cluster, as well as
define what you thing "fair" means.
SGE can handle both interactive and non-interactive jobs, manage basic job
dependencies, and has a more advanced interface through the DRMAA API.
SGE also provides resource management and load balancing (e.g. handling
software licenses and making sure compute nodes aren't oversubscribed).
There's a wealth of documentation, a very helpful mailing list,
active development, and responsive developers.
Oh, and it's free (as in beer and speech), although I think you can
throw money at Sun for support if you want.
NHGRI Linux support (Digicon Contractor)
Beowulf mailing list, Beowulf at beowulf.org sponsored by Penguin Computing
To change your subscription (digest mode or unsubscribe) visit http://www.beowulf.org/mailman/listinfo/beowulf
More information about the Beowulf