csamuel at vpac.org
Fri May 1 18:59:06 EDT 2009
----- "John Hearns" <hearnsj at googlemail.com> wrote:
> A commercial compiler - Intel / Pathscale /Portland
> will always give you better performance from an application.
The feedback from a number of our users on our Barcelona/
Shanghai cluster is that GCC beats the Intel compilers
hands down  and that the PGI ones don't tend to hold
a significant margin over GCC either.
Interestingly using the -march=amdfam10 option in GCC 4.3.3
to emit Barcelona specific optimisations produces real
application code that runs slower than the standard
optimisation options (confirmed by a couple of users).
I've built GCC 4.4.0, but we've not tested with it
(or announced it to users) yet.
 - Not surprising, it's hardly their home turf. ;-)
Christopher Samuel - (03) 9925 4751 - Systems Manager
The Victorian Partnership for Advanced Computing
P.O. Box 201, Carlton South, VIC 3053, Australia
VPAC is a not-for-profit Registered Research Agency
Beowulf mailing list, Beowulf at beowulf.org sponsored by Penguin Computing
To change your subscription (digest mode or unsubscribe) visit http://www.beowulf.org/mailman/listinfo/beowulf
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
More information about the Beowulf