jmdavis1 at vcu.edu
Thu Apr 30 11:05:29 EDT 2009
John Hearns wrote:
> A commercial compiler - Intel / Pathscale /Portland will always give
> you better performance from an application.
> The guys who work on those compilers care about optimization.
While I agree with this generality, generally. It is not always true
Specific software may actually run faster with GCC than with a
"optimized" compiler. We saw several instances of this on the Apple
cluster with GCC 4 vs. Absoft.
Also, a particular code may run much better with one "optimized"
compiler than another. I have some that require PGI to run at all. Some
that run faster with PGI. And, others run better with Intel tham PGI.
Mike Davis Technical Director
(804) 828-3885 Center for High Performance Computing
jmdavis1 at vcu.edu Virginia Commonwealth University
"Never tell people how to do things. Tell them what to do and they will surprise you with their ingenuity." George S. Patton
Beowulf mailing list, Beowulf at beowulf.org sponsored by Penguin Computing
To change your subscription (digest mode or unsubscribe) visit http://www.beowulf.org/mailman/listinfo/beowulf
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
More information about the Beowulf