[Beowulf] Moores Law is dying

Ethan VanMatre evm at stccmop.org
Thu Apr 9 14:04:53 EDT 2009

Moore's Law was the observation that the number of transistors per die 
that was economical to produce doubles in about 18 months. As process 
technology advanced our yield increased and transistors shrank. Higher 
yield only gives factors of 2 to 10 in the number of good die (this is 
the economical part) and is a battle fought with each new process 
innovation. Transistor size has a hard limit in 2-D which is reached 
when we approach atom scale devices. I imagine that Front end gates with 
oxides 3 atoms deep might just be very hard to make economically. This 
then brings us to either (or) going 3-D which can give us a few Moore's 
Law cycles (2 layers, 4 layers ) or making the die larger. Making the 
die larger has been done in a number of instances. Tektronix's 2" square 
backsided imager comes to mind. I'm equating the thinning process for a 
backside device as the same in complexity as going from a ccd imager to 
a multi core cpu.

I can well imagine a 1024 core device, and 4 of those in a 1U box. Intel 
has an 80 core device in the lab. Sure there are heat, power, memory 
problems to overcome but that is the name of the game.

We have seen the power of CPU grow such that even windows is not able to 
bring the faster processors quite to their knees. Thus the drive to the 
Atom and its like. I can imagine a notebook with a 32 core cpu that has 
slower cores than the atom. Might just be a screamer.

The demise of Moore's Law in 10 to 15 years may happen. That is if you 
use the law as stated (transistor count). If you consider the power 
(MIPS,Flops etc) if a system then clustering waferscale devices gives us 
Moore's Law growth potential for the next 20 years. Plus there are new 
technologies to be discovered.

For me the demise of Moore's law is a function of economics. How will 
Intel get its money if the cost per core is $1 and 8 cores more than 
covers your desktop (1,000,000 notebooks with $32 cpu does not pay for a 
new fab). Making the Waferscale 1024 core cpu takes a lot of research 
money. Will the sales support it?

Regards, Ethan

Ethan VanMatre - Research Systems Engineer - Computer Systems Manager
Center for Coastal Margin Observation and Prediction (CMOP)
Oregon Health & Science University
(503) 748-1157  evm at stccmop.org

Beowulf mailing list, Beowulf at beowulf.org sponsored by Penguin Computing
To change your subscription (digest mode or unsubscribe) visit http://www.beowulf.org/mailman/listinfo/beowulf

This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.

More information about the Beowulf mailing list