[Beowulf] Re: Beowulf Digest, Vol 45, Issue 28
gdjacobs at gmail.com
Thu Nov 22 05:12:42 EST 2007
Håkon Bugge wrote:
> At 21:00 17.11.2007, Chris Samuel <csamuel at vpac.org> wrote:
>> I should also point out that we're using the PGI 7.x series of
>> compilers and tell our users to build with:
>> -tp k8-64,barcelona-64
>> so that they get the optimisations for both dual and quad core chips
>> (with the appropriate path selected at run time).
> While I did the SPEC MPI 2007 for the Barcelona, I got the following
> projections (8 nodes, 8 cores per node) for SPECmpiM_base2007:
> * PathScale 3.0, -march=core: 5.53
> * PathScale 3.0, -march=opteron -msse3: 5.32
> * PGI 7.0-7, -tp barcelona-64 + lots of fancy switches: 4.71
> * PGI 7.0-7, -tp barcelona-64 -nomovnt -fast: 4.75
> I didn't have much time to play with compiler options. It was
> interesting to see that the "wrong" architecture was better using the
> PathScale compiler. Further, PathScale was significant better than PGI
> 7.0-7, even though PGI had support for the "right" architecture.
> The switches used for the PathScale compiler can be found at the SPEC
> web, http://www.spec.org/mpi2007/results/res2007q4/
> The final rate (5.61) was better, due improved memory bandwidth (due to
> a better BIOS).
No big secret, I don't think. Core optimized code will be scheduled for
a wider SIMD unit, same as Barcelona.
Geoffrey D. Jacobs
To have no errors
would be life without meaning
No struggle, no joy
Beowulf mailing list, Beowulf at beowulf.org
To change your subscription (digest mode or unsubscribe) visit http://www.beowulf.org/mailman/listinfo/beowulf
More information about the Beowulf