[Beowulf] dual-core benefits?

Joe Landman landman at scalableinformatics.com
Thu Sep 22 13:27:53 EDT 2005


Hi Tahir:

Tahir Malas wrote:
> Hi everyone,
> 
> I would like to take advice for the processor selection for the cluster that
> we will configure soon. Comparing the sequential performance of our programs
> on an Opteron 246 and a much more expensive machine with Itanium Processor,
> we have decided to use opteron processors with Tyan mbs. However, we are in
> a confusion to decide on the processor selection. Before posing my
> questions, I'd better give some info about our application requirements:
> 
> 1. The scalability of our program is not so good, less then 20 for 32 nodes
> (measured on a single node system). So we don't plan to go beyond 16 nodes.
> (which makes 32 processors due to dual-node usage)

Do you mean a single cpu per node, or single core per CPU, or a large 
SMP?  You might also wish to look at the iWill motherboards.

> 2. Memory requirement is huge; we will use 4GB memory per node for the time
> being and increase this to 16 GB later. So wee need fast CPUs and efficient
> usage of memory.

Ok, you are going to want the later model MB's that properly support 
DDR/400 to single rank dimms.  2GB dimms are still not cheap (at least 
the good ones).

> 3. Due to budget limitations we will first configure 8-node system with 4GB
> RAM per node and extend this to a 16-node system with 16-GB of RAM in 6
> months.
> 
> We were thinking of AMD 250 processors, but now the benchmarks of dual-core
> CPUs (on the web site of AMD) seems encouraging, and the cost of dual-core
> AMD 275 seems to be less then twice of AMD 250. 

http://enterprise2.amd.com/downloadables/Dual_Core_Performance.pdf and 
other I presume. :)

> Since the memory cost of our
> system will dominate other costs, we can afford to pass to dual-core
> technology. However, the questions that arise are follows.
> 
> 1. Will it worth? And can we gain any advantages over single-core with the
> not-so-good scalability of our parallel programs? 

It depends upon the code.  If your code requires very low latency, the 
benefit of dual core nodes are that you have 4 interconnected cores 
(think of them as individual processors) connected over a very high 
speed low latency interface.  If this is well coupled to the rest of the 
system through an external low latency interface (Infinipath, IB, 
Myrinet, etc), and your code is latency sensitive, then dual core could 
be a substantial win for you.  If your code simply hammers on memory 
bandwidth, then it is possible in some cases for it to be a liability 
relative to single core.  Some cases (weather codes) demonstrated 
something like this here in the recent past.

> 2. Another question is that is dual-core technology brings any advantages
> for the efficient usage of high amount of memory that we will utilize? 3. 3.

Not really advantage or disadvantage.  With single core, your aggregate 
memory bandwidth is N(cores) * Bandwidth of one of the memory busses. 
With dual core, it is (N(cores)/2) * Bandwidth of one of the memory 
busses.  This may or may not be an issue for your code.

> 3. Finally there is something basic that I'm not sure: When we assign a job
> to dual-core CPU, can it divide it between the core-CPUs automatically, or
> should we think dual-core CPU the same as dual-node CPU? If the latter is
> the case, what is the advantage of this technology over dual-node?

Think of this as 2 physicallly independent CPUs (that just happen to 
share the same space on the motherboard).  That means your dual CPU 
nodes become 4-ways.  In terms of assinging a job to a CPU (or core), 
you still need a threading library or an MPI library and appropriate 
changes to the source code to make it scale.  But the advantage for you 
would be less overall latency between CPUs for messaging using MPI, and 
large SMP nodes for OpenMP.  The potential disadvantage is loss of 
effective memory bandwidth.  If you look at the above URL for the paper, 
you will see that the bandwidth issue wasn't a factor for the tests we 
ran.  It could be for your code, and that the important part.  You need 
to test to be sure.

> 
> If anyone has info and/or experiences about these, I will be very glad to
> know. 
> 
> Thanks in advance,
> Tahir Malas
> Bilkent University 
> Electrical and Electronics Engineering Department
> Phone: +90 312 290 1385 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Beowulf mailing list, Beowulf at beowulf.org
> To change your subscription (digest mode or unsubscribe) visit http://www.beowulf.org/mailman/listinfo/beowulf

-- 
Joseph Landman, Ph.D
Founder and CEO
Scalable Informatics LLC,
email: landman at scalableinformatics.com
web  : http://www.scalableinformatics.com
phone: +1 734 786 8423
fax  : +1 734 786 8452
cell : +1 734 612 4615
_______________________________________________
Beowulf mailing list, Beowulf at beowulf.org
To change your subscription (digest mode or unsubscribe) visit http://www.beowulf.org/mailman/listinfo/beowulf



More information about the Beowulf mailing list