Fwd: Re: Linux vs FreeBSD clusters (was: how are the Redhat product changes affecting existing and future plans?)
raysonlogin at yahoo.com
Fri Nov 7 12:17:23 EST 2003
Forwarding... (Brooks is not on the beowulf list)
--- Brooks Davis <brooks at one-eyed-alien.net> wrote:
> We (my department, but mostly different people then Fellowship) have
> small 10-node setup (though each node does have 6 gigabit ports :-).
> think we're aiming to upgrade to around 48 nodes in the next year.
> Our HPC cluster is currently pretty close to what's described in the
> paper, though we are up to 160 nodes and we're adding rack space for
> another 192 this year.
> The short version of my take on which OS to run on your cluster is
> that so long as it runs the apps you need, the best OS is one you
> how to admin well since that's most of the work. I've spent a few
> weeks here and there porting applictions or improving their ports,
> by and large, most key systems are already ported to the major UNIX
> platforms. The free MPI implemntations work on just about anything,
> base Ganglia metrics work nearly everywhere (FreeBSD and Linux are at
> feature parity in the upcoming release), and SGE works on a wide
> of platforms. On an amusing note, we were the launch customer for
> Mathematica despite not running a supported OS because the Linux
> runs just fine on FreeBSD.
> -- Brooks
> Any statement of the form "X is the one, true Y" is FALSE.
> PGP fingerprint 655D 519C 26A7 82E7 2529 9BF0 5D8E 8BE9 F238 1AD4
> ATTACHMENT part 2 application/pgp-signature
Do you Yahoo!?
Protect your identity with Yahoo! Mail AddressGuard
Beowulf mailing list, Beowulf at beowulf.org
To change your subscription (digest mode or unsubscribe) visit http://www.beowulf.org/mailman/listinfo/beowulf
More information about the Beowulf