10 Pb/sec? Re: IB vs Myrinet
landman at scalableinformatics.com
Tue Nov 4 20:32:16 EST 2003
On Tue, 2003-11-04 at 19:27, Keith D. Underwood wrote:
> > Say you can run a wire/fiber/whathaveyou at 10 Gb/sec (working in powers of
> > 10, here, and 100 Gb/sec is just too hard to envision..)
> > 10 Pb/sec would be a million times faster (Peta = 1000 Tera = 1000,000
> > Giga, right?)
> Um: http://pr.fujitsu.com/en/news/2000/09/25.html
> or: http://www.siemens.com/page/1,3771,228164-1-999_4_0-0-,00.html
> Multiple Tb/s on a single fiber...
Get yer lambda's here... red hot... lots of them... 10000 to a fiber ...
Think of this like the cable TV coax coming into your house
(theoretically if need be). One wire, lots of bandwidth. I have heard
(e.g. bad memory) that TV signals require 6MHz of bandwidth, so
"hundreds" of TV stations require somewhat less than a GHz in
bandwidth. Same effect, using different 1/lambda's for each "channel".
> Of course, I don't have any idea what they are going to do with the data
> when they get it there either ;-) (i.e. issues with memory, buses,
> processor speeds, etc.) Or, for that matter, how they are going to get
> that data out of any silicon chip... But, I assume these are planned
> for after we are doing all optical computing, right? ;-)
The entropy generation rate must be huge with all that data going into
the bit bucket,
unless of course a fast enough receiver can do something about this...
k(B) ln 2 for each bit "erased", so something like ((10**15) k(B) ln
2)/second, if you consider that bits dropped on the floor are erased.
On the order of 10**(-8) W/K. I defer to practicing physicists on the
interpretation (as it is not my field).
Joseph Landman, Ph.D
Scalable Informatics LLC
email: landman at scalableinformatics.com
phone: +1 734 612 4615
Beowulf mailing list, Beowulf at beowulf.org
To change your subscription (digest mode or unsubscribe) visit http://www.beowulf.org/mailman/listinfo/beowulf
More information about the Beowulf