[xcat-user] 5/21/2003, 13:55 - Need info ! Re: [PBS-USERS] LSF vs its "Closest Competitor"

Andrew Wang andrewxwang at yahoo.com.tw
Wed May 21 20:49:22 EDT 2003


I am also interested in knowing how Platform Computing
got the numbers, or they just made the numbers up?

Andrew.

 --- c00dcw00 <c00dcw00 at nchc.org.tw> 的訊息:
> To whom it may concern :
> 
> I got the following questions, hope someone may echo
> on them, TKS !!
> 
>     1. Who's the  Closest Competitor ?
> 
>     2. Who's the 200,000+ CPU user ?
> 
>     3. What's the definition of Fairshare
> Utilization  ?
> 
>     4. Are the 100+ clusters homegeneous or
> hetrogeneous ?
> 
> Sincerely yours,
> David C. Wan
> Tel : 886-3-577-085 ext. 326
> 5/21/2003, 13:55
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Andrew Wang" <andrewxwang at yahoo.com.tw>
> To: <xcat-user at lists.xcat.org>;
> <beowulf at beowulf.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, May 21, 2003 8:47 AM
> Subject: Fwd: [PBS-USERS] LSF vs its "Closest
> Competitor"
> 
> 
> > A message from the PBS mailing-list. Anyone want
> to
> > comment?
> >
> > Andrew.
> >
> > Ron Chen wrote:
> > > Someone sent me a chat from the Platform "web
> > > event",
> > > I would like to share with PBS developers/users.
> >
>
=====================================================
> > > Performance, Scalability, Robustness
> > >
> > >                     LSF 5      Closest
> Competitor
> > >
> > > Clusters               100+                 1
> > >
> > > CPUs                 200000+               300
> > >
> > > Jobs                 500000+             ~10000+
> > > (active across clusters)
> > >
> > > Fairshare Utilization  ~100%               ~50%
> > >
> > > Query Time         20% better than        40%
> slower
> > >                       LSF 4.2              than
> LSF
> > > 5
> > >
> > > Scheduler Usage        4K/job            
> 28K/job
> > >
> >
>
========================================================
> > >
> > > I would love to hear from the people here, at
> least
> > > a number of things above are not true.
> > >
> > > I know that PBS with Globus, Silver, or other
> meta
> > > schedulers can support over 100+ clusters too.
> > >
> > > For CPUs supported, I am sure I've heard people
> > > using PBS with over 500+ processors.
> > >
> > > It would be interesting to see how Platform came
> up
> > > with the numbers!
> > >
> > >  -Ron
> > >
> >
> >
> >
>
-----------------------------------------------------------------
> > 每天都 Yahoo!奇摩
> > 該換工作了嗎? - 幫你算出最合適的求職方向
> > http://fate.yahoo.com.tw/
> > _______________________________________________
> > Beowulf mailing list, Beowulf at beowulf.org
> > To change your subscription (digest mode or
> unsubscribe) visit
> http://www.beowulf.org/mailman/listinfo/beowulf
> >
>  

-----------------------------------------------------------------
每天都 Yahoo!奇摩
該換工作了嗎? - 幫你算出最合適的求職方向
http://fate.yahoo.com.tw/
_______________________________________________
Beowulf mailing list, Beowulf at beowulf.org
To change your subscription (digest mode or unsubscribe) visit http://www.beowulf.org/mailman/listinfo/beowulf



More information about the Beowulf mailing list