Intel PRO/1000CT Gigabit ethernet with CSA
keith.murphy at attglobal.net
Fri Jun 27 17:36:37 EDT 2003
There have been competitive priced low latency interconnect cards to Myricom
for some years including products from Quadrix and Dolphin. The reason for
the lack of movement on pricing, is the high performance cluster
interconnect is still a very small market I am sure that even in the very
best of years the total yearly quantity of low latency interconnect cards
and switches sold, never exceeds the daily quantity of Ethernet cards and
switches sold. Price reductions are not reflected in Moore's law, unless
accompanied by a subsequent expotentitial leap in the size of the market.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Daniel Pfenniger" <daniel.pfenniger at obs.unige.ch>
To: "Patrick Geoffray" <patrick at myri.com>
Cc: "Beowulf cluster mailing list" <beowulf at beowulf.org>
Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 12:52 PM
Subject: Re: Intel PRO/1000CT Gigabit ethernet with CSA
> Patrick Geoffray wrote:
> > On Fri, 2003-06-27 at 13:46, Daniel Pfenniger wrote:
> >>The exact costs are presently not well fixed because several companies
> >>enter the market. The nice thing about IB is that it is an open
> >>standard, the components from different companies are compatible,
> >>which is good for pressing costs down.
> > With the slicon coming from one company (actually 2 but the second one
> > does only switch chip), the price adjustment would mainly affect the
> > reseller, where the margin are not that high. I don't expect much a
> > price war in the Infiniband market, mainly because many IB shops are
> > already just burning (limited) VC cash.
> > The main point for price advantage of IB is if the volume goes up. It's
> > a very different problem that the multiple-vendors-marketing-stuff. One
> > can argue that HPC does not yield such high volumes, only a business
> > market like the Databases one does.
> > Remember Gigabit Ethernet. It was very expensive when the early adopters
> > were the HPC crowd and the price didn't drop until it made its way to
> > the desktop. It's the case for 10GE today.
> > Patrick
> > Patrick Geoffray
> > Myricom, Inc.
> Yes I mostly agree with your analysis, database is the only significant
> potential market for IB.
> However the problem with 1GBE or 10GBE is that the latency remains poor
> for HPC applications, while IB goes in the right direction.
> The real comparison to be made is not between GE and IB, but between
> IB and Myricom products, which belong to an especially protected niche.
> As a result for years the Myrinet products did hardly drop in price
> for a sub-Moore's-law increase in performance, because of a lack of
> competition (the price we paid for our Myricom cards and switch
> 18 months ago is today *exactly* the same).
> Now IB at least introduces a healthy stimulation for this low latency
> HPC sector.
> Beowulf mailing list, Beowulf at beowulf.org
> To change your subscription (digest mode or unsubscribe) visit
Beowulf mailing list, Beowulf at beowulf.org
To change your subscription (digest mode or unsubscribe) visit http://www.beowulf.org/mailman/listinfo/beowulf
More information about the Beowulf