is this a good candidate for bproc?

Russell Nordquist rdn at uchicago.edu
Thu Jun 26 13:19:46 EDT 2003


On Thu, 26 Jun 2003 at 12:33, hanzl at noel.feld.cvut.cz wrote:

> > independent computational jobs. No mpi, etc just lots 'o non-parallel jobs.
> > ...
> > I would use bproc+SGE to keep the 1 job 1 cpu efficiency.
>
> We have something like this, and I described it here:
>
>   http://noel.feld.cvut.cz/magi/sge+bproc.html
>
> (It is a quick first draft yet uncorrected by any feedback, any
> opinions/additions/corrections from any list readers welcome).

looks good to me, thanks. I actually ran across this link when I was
researching.  Anyone got any opinions on the bproc vs the ssh/nfs
approach? I've never used bproc, so I don't have a fell for it?

russell

> Best Regards
>
> Vaclav Hanzl
> _______________________________________________
> Beowulf mailing list, Beowulf at beowulf.org
> To change your subscription (digest mode or unsubscribe) visit http://www.beowulf.org/mailman/listinfo/beowulf
>

- - - - - - - - - - - -
Russell Nordquist
UNIX Systems Administrator
Geophysical Sciences Computing
http://geosci.uchicago.edu/computing
NSIT, University of Chicago
 - - - - - - - - - - -

_______________________________________________
Beowulf mailing list, Beowulf at beowulf.org
To change your subscription (digest mode or unsubscribe) visit http://www.beowulf.org/mailman/listinfo/beowulf



More information about the Beowulf mailing list