Nice survey of higher end power supplies ...
James.P.Lux at jpl.nasa.gov
Wed Jun 11 00:35:38 EDT 2003
> > http://www17.tomshardware.com/howto/20030609/index.html
> it's interesting, but I don't think it's all that useful.
> for instance, how many of you have cluster nodes that need >400W PS's?
> as usual THG seems mainly focused on satisfying the gamer/overclocker
> that he's got Da B35t.
> one relevant and interesting factoid was that they claim the PS's
> all operate at about 70% efficiency. it's a little hard to tell
> how they measured that, but I think it's at peak load. it would
> be nice to know whether efficiency is better at sane/normal loads.
Probably worse efficiency at light loads. There's a fairly significant
"overhead" power that is consumed at all times, as well as a "proportional
to load" loss.
Also, the power factor is probably much worse at light loads, unless the PS
uses some form of harmonic/PF correction (e.g. it is CE marked, and actually
complies with the mark). The usual input stage is a rectifier to a
capacitor input filter, which has an input current waveform that is very
"pulse like" at low loads. High pulse current >> high I^2*R losses
> PF .74 on that machine, by the way. I was kind of surprised,
> since it was a compaq deskpro. pretty old, though, that's probably why.
Beowulf mailing list, Beowulf at beowulf.org
To change your subscription (digest mode or unsubscribe) visit http://www.beowulf.org/mailman/listinfo/beowulf
More information about the Beowulf