Cheap PCs from Wal-Mart

Mark Hahn hahn at
Mon Jun 2 14:42:32 EDT 2003

> re. the points on floating point performance, these are valid.
> But I think we should note the new Nehemiah boards which are just out.
> Well worth looking at I think - I intend to get one soon, and I'll report
> back if/when I do.

hmm.  for rhetorical purposes, let's compare the numbers from this article
to two high-end unis:

	dhry	whet	mmi	mmf	memi	memf
e800	1048	285	963	1588	194	208
e10k	1300	351	1193	1968	233	245
e10k-n	1591	366	2255	2285	664	389
p4	6809	9327	22170	13896	5050	5041	
ath	3319	8855	13011	12217	2912	3080

I think it's pretty clear that you need to expect much lower
performance from even the 'high-end' VIA chips.  if your code
more resembles dhrystone (mostly integer, cache friendly),
then you can mostly expect to scale with clock speed, and the 
VIA chips might be attractive on a speed/(heat*cost) basis.

for general clusters, where memory bandwidth and FP performance
and integrated gigabit are big advantages, VIA doesn't compete.

data is from the article above and

Beowulf mailing list, Beowulf at
To change your subscription (digest mode or unsubscribe) visit

More information about the Beowulf mailing list