HZ and HPC
lindahl at keyresearch.com
Wed Jan 29 01:33:54 EST 2003
On Tue, Jan 28, 2003 at 08:24:28PM -0500, Jean-Christophe Ducom wrote:
> I dont' know if this topic has been discussed previously. I was
> wondering how good/bad is the new value for timeslices HZ=512 for RH8.0
> (other distributions?) and HZ=1000 for kernel2.5.
I've lived on Alphas for ages, and it seemed to work OK.
> I understand how good it is for desktop responsiveness but won't it
> be bad if two 'intensive' jobs are running causing a lot of cache
> misses at every timeslice,
Most HPC clusters only run 1 intensive process per cpu. Yes, loading
the entire cache from a cold start takes around 1 millisecond.
Fortunately, not that many jobs are sensitive to the exact cache size
-- they tend to need more or less. If less, it won't thrash. If more,
it always thrashes.
Beowulf mailing list, Beowulf at beowulf.org
To change your subscription (digest mode or unsubscribe) visit http://www.beowulf.org/mailman/listinfo/beowulf
More information about the Beowulf