SATA or SCSI drives - Multiple Read/write speeds.

Lombard, David N david.n.lombard at
Tue Dec 9 10:03:12 EST 2003

From: Mark Hahn; Sent: Monday, December 08, 2003 3:18 PM
> SCSI:	pro: a nice bus-based architecture which makes it easy to put
> 	many disks in one enclosure.  the bus is fast enough to
> 	support around 3-5 disks without compromising bandwidth
> 	(in fact, you'll probably saturate your PCI(x) bus(es) first
> 	if you're not careful!) 10 and 15K RPM SCSI disks are common,
> 	leading to serious advantages if your workload is
> 	(mostly of small, scattered, uncachable reads, and/or
> 	writes.)  5yr warrantees and 1.2 Mhour MTBF are very comforting.

Very big pro:  You can get much higher *sustained* bandwidth levels,
regardless of CPU load.  ATA/PATA requires CPU involvement, and
bandwidth tanks under moderate CPU load.

The highest SCSI bandwidth rates I've seen first hand are 290 MB/S for
IA32 and 380 MB/S for IPF. Both had two controllers on independent PCI-X
busses, 6 disks for IA32 and 12 for IPF in a s/w RAID-0 config.

Does SATA reduce the CPU requirement from ATA/PATA, or is it the same?
Unless it's substantially lower, you still have a system best suited for
low to moderate I/O needs.

BTW, is a nice standard I/O benchmark.  But, as
mentioned earlier in this thread, app-specific benchmarking is *always*

David N. Lombard

My comments represent my opinions, not those of Intel.
Beowulf mailing list, Beowulf at
To change your subscription (digest mode or unsubscribe) visit

More information about the Beowulf mailing list