[Linux-ia64] Re: Itanium gets supercomputing software
duraid at octopus.com.au
Fri Apr 11 16:49:35 EDT 2003
I guess I was being a bit subtle.
I'm well aware there are things you can do with a simulator that you
can't do with hardware. Like test your code against what's supposed to
happen, not what actually happens. ;)
My point wasn't that software simulators are useless, but that software
simulators _should_ be useless **4 years** (!!) after the public
availability of hardware.
When I said:
> I put it to you that software is easier to develop on hardware.
I meant that at this late stage, one would expect that people would be
writing software, on their hardware. And not a whole lot else, all
things considered. Do you see x86 linux people using simulators? Once in
a blue moon, perhaps. Does anyone doubt that the x86-64 port will mature
a heck of a lot faster than linux-ia64 has? One doesn't need to think
for very long to realise why this might be.
Don't get me wrong, I think Linus was being a complete idiot for his
comments against IA64 and for x86-64, but insofar as keeping hardware
pricing so high that Joe K. Hacker can't even dream of affording it is
"good business" on Intel/HP's part, it's an even better way of keeping
your kernel untested.
David Kågedal wrote:
> Exactly. There are a lot of things that you can do with a simulator
> that you can't do with hardware. Developing software before hardware
> is available is just one of them. (plug mode on) That's why we sell
> simulators for most major current CPU architectures. Including IA64.
Beowulf mailing list, Beowulf at beowulf.org
To change your subscription (digest mode or unsubscribe) visit http://www.beowulf.org/mailman/listinfo/beowulf
More information about the Beowulf