Pros and Cons of Scyld and CLIC Mandrake
erwan at mandrakesoft.com
Thu Nov 28 11:50:15 EST 2002
Le mer 27/11/2002 à 01:43, Thomas Zheng a écrit :
> I am deciding between Scyld and CLIC Mandrake to run on my cluster. Could
> someone tell me the pros and cons of both systems?
CLIC could be view as a "beowulf one" cluster with some enhancements,
CLIC is a full GPL clustering distro and features
-"Ka-deploy" tool for a fast deployment of a golden node.
You can reinstall a full cluster in less than 3 minutes.
The installation time doesn't depend on the cluster size.
-"Urpmi parallel" for keeping your cluster up to date
RPMS packages are uploaded from the server to the nodes farm using a
parallel technology (ka-run).
-Multiple file system support
The next Clic release (in 2 weeks) will support XFS, JFS, ReiserFS,
-Non homogeous SCSI drives
Next release will support non homogeous brand of SCSI adapters
installed on nodes.
-Hudge number of librairies
CLIC contains lots of librairies such as lapack, scalapack, atlas,
CLIC autoconfigures automaticaly your cluster building a full network
services architecture using :
PXE, DHCP, NIS, NFS, NTP, DNS, MPICH, LAM, PVM ,
MAUI (Next Release), OPENPBS, GANGLIA.
Note: SSH keys are automaticaly deployed on the cluster farm.
Vrjuggler & netjuggler, povray, distcc, ccache are included.
CLIC will be available on Itanium 2 at the beginning of 2003 then AMD
CLIC doesn't support the Single System Image (SSI).
CLIC doesn't support myrinet, sci, quadrix (Future Next Release)
Linux Cluster Distribution Project Manager (CLIC)
43 rue d'aboukir 75002 Paris
Phone Number : +33 (0) 1 40 41 17 94
Fax Number : +33 (0) 1 40 41 92 00
Email : erwan at mandrakesoft.com
Web site : http://clic.mandrakesoft.com
OpenPGP key : http://www.mandrakesecure.net/cks/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the Beowulf