sram, not sdram.

Mark Hahn hahn at physics.mcmaster.ca
Thu Jan 31 11:22:58 EST 2002


> > personally, 2M seems strangely small for DDR, since it's not 
> > either fast or wide.
> 
> It's an L3, so that's DDR *sram*, not DDR SDRAM. Another system using

no, apple says sdram:
http://www.apple.com/powermac/architecture.html
the numbers check, too: it's just your basic pc2100 ddr,
giving a genuine marketing bandwidth of 4.2 GB/s total.

_______________________________________________
Beowulf mailing list, Beowulf at beowulf.org
To change your subscription (digest mode or unsubscribe) visit http://www.beowulf.org/mailman/listinfo/beowulf



More information about the Beowulf mailing list