charmm scalability on 2.4 kernels

Josip Loncaric josip at icase.edu
Tue Jan 8 10:41:06 EST 2002


"Eray Ozkural (exa)" wrote:
> 
> It was said before on this list that 2.4 already incorporates TCP fixes. Has
> anybody met a similar situation before?

Actually, Linux kernel 2.4 incorporates an improved yet very different
TCP stack where my TCP fixes do not help much in my usual test case
(point-to-point streaming of small messages).  However, Steve's
scalability problems with the stock 2.4 TCP are very interesting, since
they involve many machines, i.e. a completely different communication
pattern from my usual point-to-point tests.

Old 2.2+fix combination was pretty efficient at aggregating small
messages into larger TCP packets before sending, in fact better than
stock 2.4.  Packet aggregation is something that depends on delicate
timing of congestion control events on both sender and receiver; this is
very sensitive to the application's communication pattern.  Perhaps a
2.4 TCP fix would need to be developed after all...

Sincerely,
Josip

-- 
Dr. Josip Loncaric, Research Fellow               mailto:josip at icase.edu
ICASE, Mail Stop 132C           PGP key at http://www.icase.edu./~josip/
NASA Langley Research Center             mailto:j.loncaric at larc.nasa.gov
Hampton, VA 23681-2199, USA    Tel. +1 757 864-2192  Fax +1 757 864-6134
_______________________________________________
Beowulf mailing list, Beowulf at beowulf.org
To change your subscription (digest mode or unsubscribe) visit http://www.beowulf.org/mailman/listinfo/beowulf



More information about the Beowulf mailing list