charmm scalability on 2.4 kernels
rlatham at plogic.com
Sun Jan 6 17:44:50 EST 2002
On Sat, Jan 05, 2002 at 11:55:42PM +0200, Eray Ozkural (exa) wrote:
> On Saturday 05 January 2002 20:10, Steve Fellini wrote:
> This is rather surprising, I'd expect 2.4.x to actually improve upon 2.2.x.
> It was said before on this list that 2.4 already incorporates TCP fixes. Has
> anybody met a similar situation before?
it was said before that the tcp fixes don't make any difference.
with 2.2 you'd see some fast times and then a few really really high
times. with 2.4 you get really consitent times that are a bit slower
than the times you'd get with 2.2 + the tcp fixes.
Rob Latham <rlatham at plogic.com>
EAE8 DE90 85BB 526F 3181
1FCF 51C4 B6CB 08CC 0897
Beowulf mailing list, Beowulf at beowulf.org
To change your subscription (digest mode or unsubscribe) visit http://www.beowulf.org/mailman/listinfo/beowulf
More information about the Beowulf