HD cloning

LUK ShunTim cestluk at polyu.edu.hk
Tue Dec 5 22:56:45 EST 2000


Donald Becker wrote:

[snipped]

> 
> A common misperception when people first see the Scyld Beowulf system is
> that it is based on a NFS root scheme.
> Using a NFS root has several problems:
>    NFS is very slow
>    NFS is unreliable
>    NFS file caching has consistency and semantic problems.
> 
> Instead our model is based on a ramdisk root and cache, along with using
> 'bproc' to migrate processes from a master node.
> 
> All of the NFS problems are magnified and multiplied when working on a
> Beowulf cluster.  Unlike a workstation network, where users are idle on
> average and working on different jobs, a cluster is all about hot spots.
> The NFS server quickly becomes a major serialization point.  (The same
> observation is true of a NIS/Yellow-Pages server: when starting a cluster
> job, every processor will try to scan the password list at the same time.)
> 
> While a ramdisk root initially sounds like a waste of memory, the semantics
> of a ramdisk fits very well with what we are doing.  The Linux ramdisk code
> is unified with the buffer cache, rather than a separate page cache.  The
> files cached in the root ramdisk are mostly contain hot pages on a running
> system: the "/", /etc, /lib and /dev directories, and the common libraries.
>

I'd like to learn more: 

1. Does that mean that the scyld slave nodes can be started without any
HD/NFS mounted root filesystem at all? And that's by all of the slave
nodes? 

2. What exactly are mounted in this root ramdisk? Is there any
documentation that I can refer to?

Regards,
ST
--

_______________________________________________
Beowulf mailing list
Beowulf at beowulf.org
http://www.beowulf.org/mailman/listinfo/beowulf



More information about the Beowulf mailing list