|
|
|
Written by Douglas Eadline
|
|
Thursday, 28 February 2008 |
|
Last fall, I had an opportunity to test the new quad-core Intel® Xeon® 5400 processor
(Harpertown) processor. As the Harpertown was in short supply, I only
had two nodes (two sockets on each node for total of 16 cores) with which to run my tests.
I'm not picky, however,
I like to run HPC tests as this type of data is absent in the
mainstream press. In particular, I am most interested in how multi-core and MPI
play in the HPC space. There is plenty to discuss, but for some interesting benchmark numbers, read on.
|
|
Last Updated ( Tuesday, 22 April 2008 )
|
|
Read more...
|
|
|
Written by Douglas Eadline
|
|
Monday, 18 February 2008 |
|
Could there be a more shameless plug?
Back by popular demand, the ARC at Georgetown University has for some strange reason decided to offer my Intermediate Beowulf Administration and Optimization course for a second time this March (18th-20th). The details and background are on the
ARC HPC Training Page. Class size is limited, so if you have interest, sign up early. Course description is below. Excellent donuts.
|
|
Last Updated ( Monday, 18 February 2008 )
|
|
Read more...
|
|
|
Written by Jeff Layton
|
|
Sunday, 27 January 2008 |
|
From the "I'll take eight department"
The Linux cluster world is moving towards InfiniBand for many reasons:
bandwidth, latency, message rate, N/2, price/performance, and other factors
that affect performance and price. But usually it's focused on larger systems, many
times greater 64 nodes up to multiple thousand nodes. At that same time the
reasons for moving to InfiniBand are still valid for smaller clusters,
particularly performance, but the economics are not. Basically InfiniBand is
just too expensive for smaller systems and usually does not make sense from a
price/performance perspective. But that has just changed...
|
|
Last Updated ( Wednesday, 30 January 2008 )
|
|
Read more...
|
|
|
Written by Jeff Layton
|
|
Monday, 14 January 2008 |
|
A special article for IO Knuckleheads
In my experience there are quite a few people who don't really know
the IO performance of their application(s) nor the IO pattern. So rather
than complain about this situation, as I'm apt to do, I decided to write
a column that talks about how to capture the IO behavior of your code(s).
These steps can be done for codes where you only have the binary, not
necessarily the source. It's fairly easy to capture the information.
Processing it is another story, however.
This article will give you an introduction in how to use strace,
a commonly used debugging tool for system administrators, as a tool to
gather information on the IO pattern of your code(s). I'll show you how
to use and gather the information, including how you use it for MPI codes.
Read on if you want to learn more about how to use this simple tool to
make yourself a better cluster, well..., monkey.
|
|
Last Updated ( Monday, 28 January 2008 )
|
|
Read more...
|
|
|
Written by Douglas Eadline
|
|
Tuesday, 01 January 2008 |
|
At long last, a new poll question about compilers. The question was prompted by a surprising post on Joe Landman's Scalbility.org. The GNU 4.x series seems to be performing surprisingly well -- in one test at least. Update: Joe has posted Fortran results.
The previous poll
asked about cluster education. It seems there is a need for everything cluster these days with an emphasis on construction and design techniques. The number of respondents was a record 703! (of course if you do not change the poll question for half a year...) Past polls and other links to surveys can be found on our
Cluster Links page.
|
|
Last Updated ( Wednesday, 09 January 2008 )
|
|
| << Start < Prev 1 2 3 4 Next > End >>
| | Results 16 - 20 of 20 | |
|
|
Who's Online |
|
We have 8 guests online |
|
|
Worldwide Front Page Visits |
|
|
|
|
|
|